There is no evidence of harmful GM foods?

[News from the beginning]

When it comes to the safety evaluation of genetically modified crops, some experts claim that "there is no evidence of harm." However, what the public really wants to know is whether these foods are safe or harmful. This simple question has sparked widespread debate and concern among consumers.

There will definitely be problems

Cai Jianyi argues that since there is no evidence showing that genetically modified foods are harmless, people shouldn’t risk their health or even their lives for unproven benefits. He also points out that many foreign animals refuse to eat genetically modified feed, and in some cases, they exhibit strange behaviors or even collective aggression. If animals avoid them, why should humans take such risks? Furthermore, he warns that when powerful interest groups are involved, the information may be manipulated. In a highly technical field like biotechnology, it's crucial to remain skeptical and not blindly trust expert opinions. Lastly, he believes in natural balance—after millions of years of evolution, our bodies have adapted to natural food sources. Introducing something so different could lead to unforeseen consequences.

“Anmin notice” needs to be in place

Zhang Shuishao emphasizes that when people raise concerns about food safety, they expect clear and authoritative statements from the government to ease their worries. However, responses like “no evidence shows harm” are vague and do not provide reassurance. Such ambiguous answers can erode public trust and leave people confused and uncertain.

Safety assessment must be rigorous

Xiao River Drowning states that the standard for food should not just be “not harmful,” but truly safe. As the most direct way we interact with our environment, food directly impacts our health. Therefore, relying solely on the absence of evidence is not enough. There must be solid, direct proof that genetically modified foods are absolutely safe before any official approval is given.

Does not mean that there is no evidence in the future

Defeng highlights that although some experts claim there’s no evidence of harm, this does not logically imply that GM foods are safe. It’s possible that the research is still incomplete, and more studies may reveal negative effects later. Using such an uncertain basis to make broad claims about food safety is irresponsible. The authorities need to provide clear, definitive answers instead of vague or speculative conclusions.

Presumption of innocence does not apply to food safety

Liang Yan explains that while the presumption of innocence applies in criminal law, it doesn’t fit in the realm of food safety. Just because there’s no evidence of harm doesn’t mean it’s safe. Until proven otherwise, the precautionary principle should guide decisions. Human lives are too valuable to gamble on untested technology.

There are food standards to judge

Guo Xiaohong suggests that if the Chinese Pharmacopoeia sets strict standards for drugs, then similar standards should be applied to food. People deserve clear guidelines to assess whether the food they consume is safe. Without such standards, subjective opinions and speculation can dominate public discourse.

Expert opinion lacks credibility

You Mingjuan criticizes the current lack of trust in expert opinions. Many experts seem to give generic or dismissive responses without addressing real concerns. To regain public confidence, they need to conduct more thorough research and be more transparent in their findings.

Ge Yingchao adds that as food is essential to life, people naturally pay close attention to its safety. Since genetic modification is still a developing technology, the public expects clear answers and a sense of security. Saying “no evidence of harm” feels like an evasion, and it leaves people feeling ignored and unprotected.

People are not mice

Zhuang Haiwei makes a strong point: if experts’ statements are as unreliable as those who claim “the sky is falling,” why should the public believe them? Why should human lives be tested based on experiments done on animals? The public deserves better than vague assurances and unclear data.

Introducing GM crops is inevitable

Lao Shen notes that China’s grain imports are expected to rise sharply in the coming years. With growing demand and limited domestic production, introducing high-yield genetically modified crops may become necessary. However, this decision must be made with caution, transparency, and a deep understanding of long-term consequences.

Solar pump

Solar water pump has the characteristics of long life, low power consumption, low noise, balanced speed regulation, environmental protection and safety, reliable operation, no interference, and energy saving.
Widely used in automation equipment, water circulation, solar products, indoor and outdoor small fountains, automatic coffee machines, desktop fountains, aquarium fish tanks, miniature water landscapes and other handicrafts, village water supply, pasture water supply, remote area water supply, household water supply, garden irrigation, mobile air conditioning Equipment and refrigeration industrial equipment such as refrigerators, foot baths, juice machines, and automotive supplies.

Solar water pumps,solar circulating pumps,photovoltaic water pumps,Small solar water pump

Changzhou Yuanwang Fluid Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.ywfluid.com